Fashion Legal News and Jargon

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

On August 5, 2010, Senator Schumer introduced the Innovative Design Protection and Piracy Prevention Act ("IDPPPA"). The IDPPPA, if passed, would amend the law currently under effect which allows copyright protection for the original design of a useful article which makes the article attractive or distinctive to the purchasing public. Under the current statute, a "useful" article is limited to a "vessel hull or deck." The IDPPPA would thereby extend the protection of the current statute to fashion design. This means copycat giants like Forever 21 and Steve Madden will become immensely vulnerable to copyright infringement lawsuits.

I have mixed feelings about the statute. As a fashion lawyer who deals with intellectual property enforcement and protection on a daily basis, I wholeheartedly agree that it's crucial to give brand owners the power and the tool to enforce their rights to protect their original designs. But on the other hand, I'm worried about the stringency of the new statute and its potentially crippling and polarizing effect on the marketplace not to mention the inundation  of frivolous lawsuits. What will constitute infringement? Must you copy the design seam for seam? Or will an "inspired by" look suffice? Fashion is complex  world full of abstractions and subtleties. Is it really fair to place the judgement of fashion in the hands of people (judges and jurors) who may not have a clue?
live fabulously